You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As mentioned in #2308, the "description" field in the Parts Browser overwrites engine config descriptions in RO. Seeing as these should really be maintained by RO, and the "description" field doesn't do anything at all to parts, this functionality should probably be removed?
I, for one, would prefer the description field to not effect the .cfgs at all, and simply be retained as a way to store sources and author's notes for part configs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As mentioned in #2308, the "description" field in the Parts Browser overwrites engine config descriptions in RO. Seeing as these should really be maintained by RO, and the "description" field doesn't do anything at all to parts, this functionality should probably be removed?
I, for one, would prefer the description field to not effect the .cfgs at all, and simply be retained as a way to store sources and author's notes for part configs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: