-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 348
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Recommendations are not sorted by download count #4004
Comments
We applied the sorting to the prompt that chooses mods to satisfy a dependency (#3934), not recommendations, which is a separate screen. (EVE unfortunately recommends the EVE config virtual module instead of depending on it.) I'll look into whether we can control the ordering of providing mods for a given virtual module, at least... Update, the current ordering is not related to the ordering in the mods' relationships; the recommendations are stored in a dictionary, Sorting by download counts would certainly be an improvement over randomness, but sticking to the original ordering from the mods' relationships might be better, need to consider that for a bit... Another update, the pseudorandom ordering comes from the |
Ah interesting. I don't have a strong feeling on whether they should be sorted by download count UNLESS it's via virtual module. Proposal: first level sorting is the order given in the netkan, then if any of those are a virtual module that subset of entries is sorted by download count. What's the logic behind which one gets auto-selected then? Recommendations would always be auto-selected right? So why is only one entry checked here? Is it because checking all of them would be a conflict? Or is the same logic as described in #3934 coming into play where it's auto-selecting the top entry? |
Yup, agreed. This is what I've tried to move towards in #4007.
Each |
If you install EnvironmentalVisualEnhancements (eve redux) directly, you get this window recommending a config. For some reason Whirligig World gets auto-selected, even though it has far fewer downloads than AVP or the stock configs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: