Citation Key blocks following fields in note

[denismaier]

Depending on where citation-key is in note, later fields may not be recognized by citeproc-js. See retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex#2658 (I first thought it might be a BBT issue, but apparently it is not.)

With the three items and the minimal style below, I'm getting the following results:

1. Citation Key directly above Event date -> "match" -> Event Date not used
2. Citation Key last in Extra -> "10. Mai 2001match" -> as expecte
3. Citation Key first in Extra -> "10. Mai 2001match" -> as expected

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<style xmlns="http://purl.org/net/xbiblio/csl" class="in-text" version="1.0" demote-non-dropping-particle="never">
  <info>
    <title>event-date-test</title>
    <id>http://www.zotero.org/styles/event-date-test</id>
    <link rel="self" href="http://www.zotero.org/styles/event-date-test"/>
    <updated>2023-09-20T12:11:03+00:00</updated>
  </info>
  <citation>
    <layout>
      <date form="text" variable="event-date"/>
    </layout>
  </citation>
  <bibliography>
    <layout>
      <date form="text" variable="event-date"/>
      <choose>
        <if type="performance" match="any">
          <text value="match"/>
        </if>
      </choose>
    </layout>
  </bibliography>
</style>

[
	{
		"id": "nachwilliamshakespeareHamlet2001",
		"type": "graphic",
		"abstract": "Theateraufführung",
		"note": "type: performance\ndirector: Schlingensief || Christoph\npublisher-place: Schauspielhaus Zürich, Pfauen\nevent-date: 2001-05-10",
		"title": "Hamlet nach William Shakespeare",
		"issued": {
			"date-parts": [
				[
					"2001",
					5,
					10
				]
			]
		}
	},
	{
		"id": "HamletNachWilliam2001",
		"type": "graphic",
		"abstract": "Theateraufführung",
		"note": "type: performance\nevent-date: 2001-05-10",
		"title": "Hamlet nach William Shakespeare 2",
		"issued": {
			"date-parts": [
				[
					"2001",
					5,
					10
				]
			]
		}
	},
	{
		"id": "eventDateTest",
		"type": "graphic",
		"abstract": "Theateraufführung",
		"note": "type: performance\nevent-date: 2001-05-10",
		"title": "Hamlet nach William Shakespeare 3",
		"issued": {
			"date-parts": [
				[
					"2001",
					5,
					10
				]
			]
		}
	},
	{
		"id": "nachwilliamshakespeareHamlet2001a",
		"type": "graphic",
		"abstract": "Theateraufführung",
		"note": "event-date: 2001-05-10\ntype: performance\ndirector: Schlingensief || Christoph\npublisher-place: Schauspielhaus Zürich, Pfauen",
		"title": "Hamlet nach William Shakespeare 4",
		"issued": {
			"date-parts": [
				[
					"2001",
					5,
					10
				]
			]
		}
	},
	{
		"id": "schlingensiefHamletNachWilliam2001",
		"type": "graphic",
		"abstract": "Theateraufführung",
		"note": "type: performance\ndirector: Schlingensief || Christoph\nevent-date: 2001-05-10\npublisher-place: Schauspielhaus Zürich, Pfauen",
		"title": "Hamlet nach William Shakespeare 5",
		"issued": {
			"date-parts": [
				[
					"2001",
					5,
					10
				]
			]
		}
	}
]

Or is this a problem with how Zotero hands the data over to citeproc-js rather than a citeproc-js issue proper?

[larsgw]

I don't see citation-key (or Citation Key) in the note field of any of the input items? Might be Zotero in that case?

[denismaier]

You're right of course. The Citation Key ends up in id. And, interestingly, the other data also seems to be there, but this here doesn't work quite as it should:

But:

So:

• Citation Key in the middle -> match on type works, but event-date is not there.
• Citation Key on top -> match on type works, and event-date is there.

Any ideas?
Maybe @dstillman might be also interested in this.

[bwiernik]

This might be some leftover behavior from creating alignment with BetterBibTeX? @retorquere

[retorquere]

I haven't been able to find anything. Not in citeproc-js, not in the Zotero sources. It's in the translators, but I don't think these are involved.

[larsgw]

Okay, I think I've found it. (First off, when exporting to CSL-JSON the Citation Key field is (re)moved, but this is not the case when generating CSL-JSON for citeproc-js). Zotero transforms "Citation Key" to "citation-key", but this field is not recognized as a CSL-JSON field, and the transformation is canceled (code). "Citation Key" is not a valid variable name (docs, code). Citeproc only parses the note contents up to the first line that does not contain a note field, with the exception that the first line can contain anything:

Conforming braced-entries and line-entries must occur at the top of the note field. The set of entries may begin on the first or the second line of the field: parsing stops when the parser encounters a non-empty line after the first that does not fit the descriptions above. Parsed entries are removed from the note field before onward processing.

docs, code

[larsgw]

Depending on whether the Citation Key should be available to citeproc or not, the field should either be mapped correctly to citation-key or removed altogether. In general, the behavior of not modifying unrecognized fields can probably lead to problems down the line.

[bwiernik]

citation-key is a CSL variable. It should be available to citeprocs

[larsgw]

Would zotero/utilities#29 work?

[bwiernik]

I think so (and more broadly we need to add the other new variables in CSL 1.0.2 to that list)

[larsgw]

I'll work on it.

[bwiernik]

Thanks--I noticed that that needed to be updated a week or so ago and haven't found time to track down exactly where

[larsgw]

I've added them. It might also be useful to move non-CSL fields to the bottom of the field list (to avoid this confusing behavior for typos etc.) but I can imagine that that could cause other issues.

[denismaier]

Thanks.