You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am not the maintainer of MLUtils.jl but I believe that anything related to specific domains such as time series, spatial data should be developed in separate projects.
You could even use these with time series data. Alternatively, you can propose specific validation methods in TimeSeries.jl or any other package that is devoted to the analysis of time series objects.
MLDataPattern.jl had time series functions, but they were tricky to work with and didn't compose as well with the rest of the package. In general, time dimensions are hard to get right. So, a quick port of the MLDataPattern.jl functions is probably not what we want here. Indeed, what we finally land on might be more appropriate in a separate package as Julio suggested.
So, the answer is yes, but whatever is proposed will have to be carefully considered for how we want to work with temporal data in general.
Hi,
have you thought about porting some Time Series utility functions? Such as
kfold
for time series?https://alan-turing-institute.github.io/MLJ.jl/stable/evaluating_model_performance/#MLJBase.TimeSeriesCV
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: