Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

explicittransform does an unintuitive thing #130

Open
PetrKryslUCSD opened this issue May 23, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

explicittransform does an unintuitive thing #130

PetrKryslUCSD opened this issue May 23, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@PetrKryslUCSD
Copy link
Contributor

PetrKryslUCSD commented May 23, 2021

I have two symmetric PD sparse matrices, and I call

d, v, nconv = eigs(Symmetric(K+OmegaShift*M), Symmetric(M); nev=neigvs, which=:SM)

Clearly it is reasonable to expect the results to be normalized relative to the matrix B. This however does not happen
since the designation of the matrices as symmetric is lost due to explicittransform being set internally to :shiftinvert.
This is a violation of backward compatibility.

@PetrKryslUCSD
Copy link
Contributor Author

Also, allowing explicit transform to happen appears to carry with it a significant performance penalty. In the above case the execution time more than doubled.

@ViralBShah
Copy link
Collaborator

See #120

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants