Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why not add subsection of the convolution? #399

Open
Longhao-Chen opened this issue Jan 17, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Why not add subsection of the convolution? #399

Longhao-Chen opened this issue Jan 17, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@Longhao-Chen
Copy link
Contributor

Just like the MATLAB conv function.

'full' — Return the full 2-D convolution.

'same' — Return the central part of the convolution, which is the same size as A.

'valid' — Return only parts of the convolution that are computed without zero-padded edges.

I think this can be achieved by splitting the existing output.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants