You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am debating the following. Some people do a thing where they have decadal or centurial averages that also resolve the seasonal cycle. This means each data point is an average of a all included Januaries in a 100-year span, then all Februaries, etc. etc., and then after the cycle closes we have an average over all included Januaries of the next 100-years.
Now, the question is, how should we identify this kind of sampling? Should be a monthly sampling, or should it be :other?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
not sure I am addressing the question correctly wrt ClimateBase.jl but monthly climatology is how most folks would call this I think. you can say monthly climatology for years 1 to 100 and so on.
I see, well then the answer to the original post is "yes". Since I'm not climate scientist by training, most "established conventions" i don't really know yet...
I am debating the following. Some people do a thing where they have decadal or centurial averages that also resolve the seasonal cycle. This means each data point is an average of a all included Januaries in a 100-year span, then all Februaries, etc. etc., and then after the cycle closes we have an average over all included Januaries of the next 100-years.
Now, the question is, how should we identify this kind of sampling? Should be a monthly sampling, or should it be
:other
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: