Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Trying to use JSBSim.jl #3

Open
galleon opened this issue Jan 3, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Trying to use JSBSim.jl #3

galleon opened this issue Jan 3, 2022 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@galleon
Copy link

galleon commented Jan 3, 2022

Hi
I have given a try to the package in Pluto. Unfortunately I got the following error:

Failed to precompile JSBSim [1735446d-a1d9-49ef-8d9f-4aa6b1e90fb9] to /Users/alleon_g/.julia/compiled/v1.7/JSBSim/jl_OvET7W.

error(::String)@error.jl:33
compilecache(::Base.PkgId, ::String, ::IO, ::IO, ::Bool)@loading.jl:1466
compilecache(::Base.PkgId, ::String)@loading.jl:1410
_require(::Base.PkgId)@loading.jl:1120
require(::Base.PkgId)@loading.jl:1013
require(::Module, ::Symbol)@loading.jl:997
top-level scope@Local: 1

I am working under Mac (12.1) using Julia 1.7.0.

Happy to help if I can ... but not sure where to start :-)

@bcoconni
Copy link
Member

bcoconni commented Jan 6, 2022

Well, unlike our JSBSim conda package, the Julia package is not automatically updated as new versions of JSBSim are issued.

It's likely that the build_tarballs.jl script should be updated on Yggdrasil

@bcoconni
Copy link
Member

bcoconni commented Jan 6, 2022

Also note that the Julia package is built successfully by our CI for MacOS X so I am anticipating that only simple changes are needed.

@bcoconni bcoconni self-assigned this Sep 25, 2022
@bcoconni
Copy link
Member

Hi, it took quite some time but it finally happened: the version 0.2.0 of the package has just been released and it is based on JSBSim last official revision 1.1.12.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants