Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge release/1.8.0 into spack-stack-dev #478

Conversation

climbfuji
Copy link
Collaborator

@climbfuji climbfuji commented Oct 3, 2024

All in the title. For testing, see CI tests below and JCSDA/spack-stack#1321.

Note that some of the CI tests for spack itself are failing (see below and https://github.com/JCSDA/spack/actions/runs/11155057001?pr=478). However, these seem to be unrelated to this PR, since I see the same problems when I run the CI spack tests for spack-stack-dev (https://github.com/JCSDA/spack/actions/runs/11161442545/job/31029164908). Maybe this needs an update from spack develop to work properly?

teaguesterling and others added 10 commits August 30, 2024 17:35
…ck#477)

Bug fix for compiling [email protected] with gfortran < 10

---------

Co-authored-by: RatkoVasic-NOAA <[email protected]>
This PR adds in the necessary configuration to get the latest MacOS and Command Line Tools versions working (14.6.1 and 15.3 respectively).

This PR includes a patch for FMS 2024.02 and a variant spec that builds shared (dylib) libraries. This makes it unnecessary to do the manual FMS build workaround that was recently published. The FMS patch is only needed for version 2024.02 in that the next version (2024.03) contains the update to the CMakeLists.txt file that adds in the shared library option.

---------

Co-authored-by: Dom Heinzeller <[email protected]>
@climbfuji climbfuji merged commit 6f9a6ba into JCSDA:spack-stack-dev Oct 3, 2024
13 of 15 checks passed
@climbfuji climbfuji deleted the feature/merge_rel180_into_spackstackdev branch October 3, 2024 16:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants