You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I notice that your template is within (0,0.0099) and you do not normalize the template to (0,1) though there is such a choice. Would this affect the sigmoid function and BCE? Because usually, we use binary labels for this. May I ask any reason behind that?
Just want to make sure I am not missing important details! It will be helpful if you can answer these. Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The template reflects a probability distribution over positions, so everything should sum up to 1. As you mentioned, usually BCE is used for binary labels, but it can also be used to measure a distribution to another, as negative log-likelihood does.
Hi, thanks for your excellent work!
I notice that your template is within (0,0.0099) and you do not normalize the template to (0,1) though there is such a choice. Would this affect the sigmoid function and BCE? Because usually, we use binary labels for this. May I ask any reason behind that?
Just want to make sure I am not missing important details! It will be helpful if you can answer these. Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: