You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello! I am trying to implement other reinforcement learning method to deal with the l2rpn problem, but I find that my result cannot match the performance with the DQN implementation in l2rpn-baselines.
Even I use the other library to implement the DQN, when I change the hyperparameters a little, I cannot get the reasonable result.
So I want to know how you fine-tune the hyperparameters of DQN in the l2rpn problem. Is there any tricks?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Fine tuning NN hyperparameters is a whole research area and there is no definitive answer.
For the DQN, it has been done by trial and error, alongside rigorous data tracking in both spreadsheets and tensorboard.
A good starting point is also to use the hyperparameters of the reference literature.
Finally, I would consider the DQN more like an example of how to get started with L2RPN+NN approach, not like a really good performing baseline. This is because the L2RPN challenge is more about solving the increasing complexity as the grid size grows from 10, to 100, 1000, and 10000 nodes; which a DQN cannot handle with its 1:1 mapping of output to actions.
Hello! I am trying to implement other reinforcement learning method to deal with the l2rpn problem, but I find that my result cannot match the performance with the DQN implementation in l2rpn-baselines.
Even I use the other library to implement the DQN, when I change the hyperparameters a little, I cannot get the reasonable result.
So I want to know how you fine-tune the hyperparameters of DQN in the l2rpn problem. Is there any tricks?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: