-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
2022 11 09 #59
Labels
Comments
attended! woop |
attended! |
Attended |
attended |
Attended |
1 similar comment
Attended |
Attended. |
attended |
Attended |
1 similar comment
Attended |
Agreed to closed |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Date
2022 11 09 - 3pm UTC - See the time in your timezone https://everytimezone.com/s/a8399b00
Meeting notices
Antitrust Policy
Linux Foundation meetings involve participation by industry competitors, and it is the intention of the Linux Foundation to conduct all of its activities in accordance with applicable antitrust and competition laws. It is therefore extremely important that attendees adhere to meeting agendas, and be aware of, and not participate in, any activities that are prohibited under applicable US state, federal or foreign antitrust and competition laws.
Examples of types of actions that are prohibited at Linux Foundation meetings and in connection with Linux Foundation activities are described in the Linux Foundation Antitrust Policy available at http://www.linuxfoundation.org/antitrust-policy. If you have questions about these matters, please contact your company counsel, or if you are a member of the Linux Foundation, feel free to contact Andrew Updegrove of the firm of Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the Linux Foundation.
Recordings
WG agreed to record all meeting. This meeting recording will be available until the next scheduled meeting
Recorded meeting
Roll Call
Please add 'Attended' to this issue during the meeting to denote attendance.
Any untracked attendees will be added by the GSF team below:
Agenda
Review Pull Requests
Projects Update
Transfer of projects
Transfer to the Standards Working Group
Transfer to the Community WG
Issues
Chris reviews the submission- usually the DCO adopts the standard LF template; https://developercertificate.org/ - I haven't seen any deviations from that personally.
DCO
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Developer_Certificate_of_Origin
CLA
A formal agreement that individual contributors and members need to sign.
source: https://opensource.com/article/18/3/cla-vs-dco-whats-difference
AI: Sean to submit this to the SC for ratification
Discussion to be reviewed at the next meeting
Opensource WG webpages
GSF Updates
Next Meeting
AOB
Adjourn
Action Items
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: