You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Linux Foundation meetings involve participation by industry competitors, and it is the intention of the Linux Foundation to conduct all of its activities in accordance with applicable antitrust and competition laws. It is therefore extremely important that attendees adhere to meeting agendas, and be aware of, and not participate in, any activities that are prohibited under applicable US state, federal or foreign antitrust and competition laws.
Examples of types of actions that are prohibited at Linux Foundation meetings and in connection with Linux Foundation activities are described in the Linux Foundation Antitrust Policy available at http://www.linuxfoundation.org/antitrust-policy. If you have questions about these matters, please contact your company counsel, or if you are a member of the Linux Foundation, feel free to contact Andrew Updegrove of the firm of Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the Linux Foundation.
Recordings
We're happy to start recording these meetings if we receive any requests to record them.
Roll Call
Please add a comment to this issue during the meeting to denote attendance.
.NET8 article .NET8 blog article #501
Beginning of May holiday in Japan - likely to have a draft together mid May. Blocked by v1.4 release, and publishing new Helm chart. Aiming to share a draft with Vaughan end of next week / beginning of following week. Then GSF Comms will review before publishing.
I have created the changelog, and FYI I have also done a bit of clean up in branches (I only deleted branches that indicated having been merged or closed)
Date
2024-04-30 - 7am UTC
Meeting notices
Antitrust Policy
Linux Foundation meetings involve participation by industry competitors, and it is the intention of the Linux Foundation to conduct all of its activities in accordance with applicable antitrust and competition laws. It is therefore extremely important that attendees adhere to meeting agendas, and be aware of, and not participate in, any activities that are prohibited under applicable US state, federal or foreign antitrust and competition laws.
Examples of types of actions that are prohibited at Linux Foundation meetings and in connection with Linux Foundation activities are described in the Linux Foundation Antitrust Policy available at http://www.linuxfoundation.org/antitrust-policy. If you have questions about these matters, please contact your company counsel, or if you are a member of the Linux Foundation, feel free to contact Andrew Updegrove of the firm of Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the Linux Foundation.
Recordings
We're happy to start recording these meetings if we receive any requests to record them.
Roll Call
Please add a comment to this issue during the meeting to denote attendance.
Any untracked attendees will be added by the GSF team below
Agenda
Convene & Roll Call (5mins)
Review Meeting Notices (see above)
Review the agenda and suggest new agenda points
Approve Past Meeting Minutes
v1.4 release
We shouldn't release until this v1.4 release also adheres to all Graduation criteria quality.
- Check our published documentation to identify any references to .NET7 #506
- security.md and enablement.md definitely need updating
- Release notes - we've been waiting on @danuw who is on holiday. @vaughanknight will ask him again. But it's most likely we will release once he is back from holiday.
.NET8 article .NET8 blog article #501
Beginning of May holiday in Japan - likely to have a draft together mid May. Blocked by v1.4 release, and publishing new Helm chart. Aiming to share a draft with Vaughan end of next week / beginning of following week. Then GSF Comms will review before publishing.
IF PlugIn Finalise Impact Framework Plug-In #502
Waiting on @danuw to return before agreeing the decisions in the issue.
Watt time v3 [Feature Contribution]: Add support for WattTime v3 - latest version of the API with new features and coverage #443 - What actions do we need to take?
Actions outlined in this comment:
[Feature Contribution]: Add support for WattTime v3 - latest version of the API with new features and coverage #443 (comment)
Review Pull Requests
Discuss Issues
PRs
Issues
#445 - We should bring codecov back as our security.md mentions we use it. What actions do we need to take?
Comment on this issue here #445 (comment)
Discussion
Action Items
Next Meeting
Tuesday 7th May @Sophietn is away on holiday.
Meeting attended by
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: