🎯 2023-10-17 Carbon Aware SDK Weekly Meeting Agenda

[Willmish]

Date

2023-10-17 - 8am UTC

Meeting notices

Antitrust Policy

Linux Foundation meetings involve participation by industry competitors, and it is the intention of the Linux Foundation to conduct all of its activities in accordance with applicable antitrust and competition laws. It is therefore extremely important that attendees adhere to meeting agendas, and be aware of, and not participate in, any activities that are prohibited under applicable US state, federal or foreign antitrust and competition laws.

Examples of types of actions that are prohibited at Linux Foundation meetings and in connection with Linux Foundation activities are described in the Linux Foundation Antitrust Policy available at http://www.linuxfoundation.org/antitrust-policy. If you have questions about these matters, please contact your company counsel, or if you are a member of the Linux Foundation, feel free to contact Andrew Updegrove of the firm of Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the Linux Foundation.

Recordings

GSF project meetings may be recorded for use solely by the GSF team for administration purposes. In very limited instances, and with explicit approval, recordings may be made more widely available.

Roll Call

Please add a comment to this issue during the meeting to denote attendance.

Full Name	Affiliation	GitHub username (optional)
Vaughan Knight	Microsoft	vaughanknight

Any untracked attendees will be added by the GSF team below

Agenda

• Convene & Roll Call (5mins)
• Review Meeting Notices (see above)
• Review the agenda and suggest new agenda points
• Approve Past Meeting Minutes
• https://github.com/orgs/Green-Software-Foundation/discussions/67
• CA SDK - will be undergoing review to officially be a "graduated" project under GSF https://oc.greensoftware.foundation/project-incubation-exit.html
• Review Pull Requests
  • Add Helm chart and workflow #381
  • Implement Data Source Registration per ADR-0006 #366
  • Hanging: updated documentation to refer to the new arch diagram #353 Add example for 'podman play kube' #340 Added JsonForecast datasource #312
• Discuss Issues

PRs

Issues

Discussion

• https://github.com/orgs/Green-Software-Foundation/discussions/67

Action Items

• @ All : Flag issues and PRs that we would like to take into the next release to appear on the Carbon Aware SDK project board (see comments below for steps on how to if unclear)

from previous meeting

• ASK: Review discussion under [Feature Contribution]: Better to throw exception when future datetime is specified to endpoints for current/historical data #396
• @vaughanknight , about Add Helm chart and workflow #381, as per comments in the PR, do we (1) need to edit ADR, (2) do not need to edit the ADR, (3) edit the ADR separately ? Assuming (30 separate for now if we need to, but please confirm cc @YaSuenag
• @danuw to progress [Bug]: Fix and update doc deployment workflow #344 following latest feedback
• next meeting: check status of Added JsonForecast datasource #312
• [Feature Contribution]: Better to throw exception when future datetime is specified to endpoints for current/historical data #396 Action @vaughanknight DECISION: Create an ADR for this issue and discuss how we proceed
• @Willmish catchup with @bderusha : re: PR and ask on upgrading from .NET 6 to .NET 8
• @Willmish check with @seanmcilroy29 whether we can/is project meeting inviting automated via https://greensoftware.foundation/subscribe/ for CA SDK
• @tiwatsuka - open issue for upgrading the .NET version of CA SDK + explain the benefits for logging metrics/other

Meeting attended by

[vaughanknight]

Attended

[Willmish]

Attended

[danuw]

Attended

[vaughanknight]

ACTION - @danuw to test #381

[vaughanknight]

I updated #396 to ask for the ADR to be created.

[Willmish]

Updates:

• next week's meeting cancelled due to chair unavailability

[tiwatsuka]

Attended

[YaSuenag]

@ All : Flag issues and PRs that we would like to take into the next release to appear on the Carbon Aware SDK project board (see comments below for steps on how to if unclear)

What should I do? Should I add v1.2 label to PRs / issues, and put them into project board by myself? https://github.com/orgs/Green-Software-Foundation/projects/15/views/2

[YaSuenag]

[x] ASK: Review discussion under [Feature Contribution]: Better to throw exception when future datetime is specified to endpoints for current/historical data #396

I've posted PR to add this ADR in #406.