Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider use of SHACL for constraints rather than OWL restrictions #218

Open
rivettp opened this issue Jan 25, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Consider use of SHACL for constraints rather than OWL restrictions #218

rivettp opened this issue Jan 25, 2022 · 0 comments
Assignees
@dallemang @rivettp @tahoeblue
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@rivettp
Copy link
Contributor

rivettp commented Jan 25, 2022

SHACL is now more mainstream, with good/efficient tool support, and closer in spirit to the original XSD constraints.
Closed World constraint execution, provided by SHACL but not OWL, are more applicable to the GLEIF dataset e.g. it should be reported if a L1 record references a RA or a ELF that does not exist.

This is a significant change that needs review and planning.
@rivettp rivettp added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 26, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@dallemang dallemang

@rivettp rivettp

@tahoeblue tahoeblue

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@dallemang @rivettp @tahoeblue