Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Proposal] review license.csv codelist #123

Open
odscjen opened this issue Jul 4, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

[Proposal] review license.csv codelist #123

odscjen opened this issue Jul 4, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
metadata Issues related to common, core metadata proposal New feature or request

Comments

@odscjen
Copy link
Contributor

odscjen commented Jul 4, 2023

What is the context or reason for the change?

The open license.csv codelist has only a few licenses covered, need to review this list and if necessary add additional commonly used licenses.

What is your proposed change?

review and update license.csv codelist. This is an open codelist so will not require any changes to the schema.

@odscjen odscjen added proposal New feature or request metadata Issues related to common, core metadata labels Jul 4, 2023
@odscjen odscjen changed the title [Proposal] [Proposal] review license.csv codelist Jul 4, 2023
@pzwsk
Copy link
Contributor

pzwsk commented Jul 11, 2023

I would suggest to use the list of conformant licenses from https://opendefinition.org/licenses/ as baseline

stufraser1 added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 12, 2023
This is what the table would look like with 'other conformant licences' added to the recommended conformant licences, which were already included from https://opendefinition.org/licenses/ per #123 

I question the value of including the several deprecated licences.
@stufraser1 stufraser1 mentioned this issue Jul 12, 2023
2 tasks
@stufraser1
Copy link
Member

stufraser1 commented Jul 13, 2023

The following licences are used in WB Data Catalog - we should include all of these
image

@matamadio
Copy link
Contributor

Custom license to be added - that might require an additional field to specify the license

@matamadio matamadio reopened this Sep 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
metadata Issues related to common, core metadata proposal New feature or request
Projects
Status: Under discussion
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants