Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Add consistent labels to all resources created by the Helm chart #302

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 8, 2024

Conversation

ppawlowski
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This pull request adds labels to all resources to improve organization and management of the application. The labels are added to the ConfigMaps, Secrets, Namespaces, Jobs, Deployments, Services, Ingresses, NetworkPolicies, ServiceAccounts, ClusterRoles, and RoleBindings. This change ensures that all resources have consistent labelling and makes it easier to identify and manage them.

Related Issue(s)

#298
#268

Checklist

  • I have read the contribution guidelines
  • Suitable unit/system level tests have been added and they pass
  • Documentation has been updated
    • Upgrade instructions
    • Configuration details
    • Concepts
  • Changes flowforge.yml?
    • Issue/PR raised on FlowFuse/helm to update ConfigMap Template
    • Issue/PR raised on FlowFuse/CloudProject to update values for Staging/Production

Labels

  • Backport needed? -> add the backport label
  • Includes a DB migration? -> add the area:migration label

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2024

node-red:3.1.x-main-linux-amd64 scan results

6 tests  ±0   0 ✅ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
2 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
1 files   ±0   6 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 913e9e4. ± Comparison against base commit 4fedc21.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2024

node-red:2.2.3-main-linux-amd64 scan results

26 tests  ±0    0 ✅ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
 4 suites ±0    0 💤 ±0 
 1 files   ±0   26 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 913e9e4. ± Comparison against base commit 4fedc21.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2024

node-red:3.0.2-main-linux-amd64 scan results

1 files  ±0  4 suites  ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
7 tests ±0  0 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  7 ❌ ±0 
8 runs  ±0  0 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  8 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 913e9e4. ± Comparison against base commit 4fedc21.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2024

file-server:main-linux-amd64 scan results

1 tests  ±0   0 ✅ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
4 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
1 files   ±0   1 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 913e9e4. ± Comparison against base commit 4fedc21.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2024

node-red:3.0.2-main-linux-arm64 scan results

1 files  ±0  4 suites  ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
7 tests ±0  0 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  7 ❌ ±0 
8 runs  ±0  0 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  8 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 913e9e4. ± Comparison against base commit 4fedc21.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2024

node-red:2.2.3-main-linux-arm64 scan results

26 tests  ±0    0 ✅ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
 4 suites ±0    0 💤 ±0 
 1 files   ±0   26 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 913e9e4. ± Comparison against base commit 4fedc21.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2024

file-server:main-linux-arm64 scan results

1 tests  ±0   0 ✅ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
4 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
1 files   ±0   1 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 913e9e4. ± Comparison against base commit 4fedc21.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2024

node-red:3.1.x-main-linux-arm64 scan results

6 tests  ±0   0 ✅ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
2 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
1 files   ±0   6 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 913e9e4. ± Comparison against base commit 4fedc21.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2024

forge-k8s:main-linux-amd64 scan results

1 tests  ±0   0 ✅ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
4 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
1 files   ±0   1 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 913e9e4. ± Comparison against base commit 4fedc21.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2024

forge-k8s:main-linux-arm64 scan results

1 tests  ±0   0 ✅ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
4 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
1 files   ±0   1 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 913e9e4. ± Comparison against base commit 4fedc21.

@hardillb hardillb merged commit 5a0a033 into main Feb 8, 2024
41 checks passed
@hardillb hardillb deleted the feat-labels branch February 8, 2024 09:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants