Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Add log passthrough support #300

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 6, 2024
Merged

feat: Add log passthrough support #300

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 6, 2024

Conversation

hardillb
Copy link
Contributor

@hardillb hardillb commented Feb 6, 2024

part of FlowFuse/flowfuse#3324

Description

Allows NR Pod log output to be enabled

Related Issue(s)

FlowFuse/flowfuse#3324

Checklist

  • I have read the contribution guidelines
  • Suitable unit/system level tests have been added and they pass
  • Documentation has been updated
    • Upgrade instructions
    • Configuration details
    • Concepts
  • Changes flowforge.yml?
    • Issue/PR raised on FlowFuse/helm to update ConfigMap Template
    • Issue/PR raised on FlowFuse/CloudProject to update values for Staging/Production

Labels

  • Backport needed? -> add the backport label
  • Includes a DB migration? -> add the area:migration label

@hardillb hardillb added this to the 2.1 milestone Feb 6, 2024
@hardillb hardillb self-assigned this Feb 6, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2024

node-red:3.1.x-main-linux-amd64 scan results

6 tests  ±0   0 ✅ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
2 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
1 files   ±0   6 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit f6be221. ± Comparison against base commit 23a0f51.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2024

node-red:2.2.3-main-linux-amd64 scan results

26 tests  ±0    0 ✅ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
 4 suites ±0    0 💤 ±0 
 1 files   ±0   26 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit f6be221. ± Comparison against base commit 23a0f51.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2024

node-red:3.0.2-main-linux-amd64 scan results

1 files  ±0  4 suites  ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
7 tests ±0  0 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  7 ❌ ±0 
8 runs  ±0  0 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  8 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit f6be221. ± Comparison against base commit 23a0f51.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2024

file-server:main-linux-amd64 scan results

1 tests  ±0   0 ✅ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
4 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
1 files   ±0   1 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit f6be221. ± Comparison against base commit 23a0f51.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2024

node-red:2.2.3-main-linux-arm64 scan results

26 tests  ±0    0 ✅ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
 4 suites ±0    0 💤 ±0 
 1 files   ±0   26 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit f6be221. ± Comparison against base commit 23a0f51.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2024

node-red:3.0.2-main-linux-arm64 scan results

1 files  ±0  4 suites  ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
7 tests ±0  0 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  7 ❌ ±0 
8 runs  ±0  0 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  8 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit f6be221. ± Comparison against base commit 23a0f51.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2024

forge-k8s:main-linux-amd64 scan results

1 tests  ±0   0 ✅ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
4 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
1 files   ±0   1 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit f6be221. ± Comparison against base commit 23a0f51.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2024

file-server:main-linux-arm64 scan results

1 tests  ±0   0 ✅ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
4 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
1 files   ±0   1 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit f6be221. ± Comparison against base commit 23a0f51.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2024

node-red:3.1.x-main-linux-arm64 scan results

6 tests  ±0   0 ✅ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
2 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
1 files   ±0   6 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit f6be221. ± Comparison against base commit 23a0f51.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2024

forge-k8s:main-linux-arm64 scan results

1 tests  ±0   0 ✅ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
4 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
1 files   ±0   1 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit f6be221. ± Comparison against base commit 23a0f51.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@hardillb hardillb changed the title Add log passthrough support Feat: Add log passthrough support Feb 6, 2024
@hardillb hardillb changed the title Feat: Add log passthrough support feature: Add log passthrough support Feb 6, 2024
@hardillb hardillb changed the title feature: Add log passthrough support feat: Add log passthrough support Feb 6, 2024
@ppawlowski ppawlowski merged commit 82713e5 into main Feb 6, 2024
41 of 43 checks passed
@ppawlowski ppawlowski deleted the log-passthrough branch February 6, 2024 10:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants