Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

chore: Bump workflows v4.0.1 #276

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

chore: Bump workflows v4.0.1 #276

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

ppawlowski
Copy link
Contributor

@ppawlowski ppawlowski commented Jan 11, 2024 •
edited by hardillb
Loading

Description

Bump workflows v4.0.1 due to minor bug in input values.

Depends on:

Related Issue(s)

Checklist

  • I have read the contribution guidelines
  • Suitable unit/system level tests have been added and they pass
  • Documentation has been updated
    • Upgrade instructions
    • Configuration details
    • Concepts
  • Changes flowforge.yml?
    • Issue/PR raised on FlowFuse/helm to update ConfigMap Template
    • Issue/PR raised on FlowFuse/CloudProject to update values for Staging/Production

Labels

  • Backport needed? -> add the backport label
  • Includes a DB migration? -> add the area:migration label

@hardillb
Copy link
Contributor

This PR also includes all the changes in #275 which we need to talk about first

@ppawlowski
Copy link
Contributor Author

This PR also includes all the changes in #275 which we need to talk about first

They should not, not sure why they are included. I will clean this mess.

@ppawlowski ppawlowski closed this Jan 12, 2024
@ppawlowski ppawlowski deleted the bump-workflows-v4.0.1 branch January 12, 2024 10:08
@ppawlowski
Copy link
Contributor Author

Moved to #277

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@hardillb hardillb Awaiting requested review from hardillb

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@ppawlowski @hardillb