Replies: 4 comments
-
Could you show the full configuration? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Sure. here's the full frr.conf: frr version 9.1.1 The static IPs in this config get updated by a script that adds and removes them as required. Thanks! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Update: I found #15611 earlier, which appears to be a bug thats very similar to what I'm seeing that's already being (been?) addressed. Unless I'm reading it wrongly? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Struggling to find a work around for this. I've tried releases back to 8.2.2, which appears to be the first release to support RHEL9, and the issue is there. I've also tried FRR9 on my old CentOS7 server which FRR7.2 is working correctly, and it has the same issue, so it certainly seems to be a change that happened between FRR versions 7.2 and 8.2.2 somewhere. Does anyone have any thoughts on whether this is something we can fix or work around? Thanks, Al |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi,
Hoping someone can help me with a little issue I'm having upgrading a system from CentOS7/FRR7.2 to RHEL9 FRR9.1.1.
We've had the FRR7.2 install in place for 4 or 5 years with no issues, but we need to upgrade the hosts to RHEL9 and at the same time I thought I'd take the opportunity to upgrade FRR to the latest 9.1.1. We use it to advertise some local routes out to the network via BGP, and on this new version (same config) v4 is working identically to before, but the next-hop we set for v6 appears to be getting overwritten. Here's a snippet from the debug log:
2024/06/28 13:42:56 BGP: [TN0HX-6G1RR] u2:s2 send UPDATE w/ attr: , origin ?, mp_nexthop fd00::a02:202, metric 0, community 5089:4802, path 65000 65000 65000
2024/06/28 13:42:56 BGP: [H06SA-0JAPR] u2:s2 send MP_REACH for afi/safi IPv6/unicast
2024/06/28 13:42:56 BGP: [HVRWP-5R9NQ] u2:s2 send UPDATE 2a04:3541:1000:500:1405:37ff:fe8a:6be9/128 IPv6 unicast
2024/06/28 13:42:56 BGP: [WEV7K-2GAQ5] u2:s2 send UPDATE len 105 (max message len: 4096) numpfx 1
2024/06/28 13:42:56 BGP: [NNG4V-WFG7M] u2:s2 10.178.224.63 send UPDATE w/ mp_nexthop ::ffff:ab2:dd61
As you can see the next-hop is correctly set to fd00::a02:202 in the first instance, but then in the final line gets set to ::ffff:ab2:dd61, the address we have configured on the mgmt interface. The route-map where this gets set looks like this:
I have confirmed its matching against this route-map correctly and as I said this config is the same one that's been working perfectly for years.
I also checked this behaviour against FRR8, and get the same issue. So it looks like something has changed between FRR7.2 and later versions.
If anyone has any clues about this change in behaviour and how I work around it, it would be really appreciated!
Thanks,
Al
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions