ospf: getting route defined in Linux. Possible simple set up problem #16005
Unanswered
colinpaicemq
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment
-
It works with frr 8.1-1ubuntu1.9 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I am trying to use ospf to connect some systems together.
On a Ubuntu Linux, I can see the OSPF definition, but there is no route defined to Linux.
For example
show ip route
K>* 0.0.0.0/0 [0/600] via 192.168.1.254, wlp4s0, 01:38:03
O>* 10.1.0.0/24 [110/300] is directly connected, enp0s31f6, weight 1, 01:03:53
L>* 10.1.0.2/32 is directly connected, enp0s31f6, 01:03:53
O 10.1.1.0/24 [110/310] via 10.1.0.3, enp0s31f6 inactive, weight 1, 01:02:58
K>* 10.1.1.0/24 [0/0] via 10.1.0.3, enp0s31f6, 01:06:59
O 10.1.3.0/24 [110/310] via 10.1.0.3, enp0s31f6 inactive, weight 1, 01:02:58
K>* 169.254.0.0/16 [0/1000] is directly connected, wlp4s0, 01:38:03
O 192.168.1.0/24 [110/20] via 10.1.0.3, enp0s31f6 inactive, weight 1, 01:02:57
L>* 192.168.1.222/32 is directly connected, wlp4s0, 01:38:03
there is an OSPF route for 10.1.3.0/24, but there is no matching route in Linux. If I ping 10.1.3.1 it goes via the default route (wireless).
This is a pretty basic problem, so I'm guessing that this is a set up problem.
I have sysctl set (as per doc)
and a frr.conf file at my local end of
and a config at the remote end of
grepping for the IP address in the trace at my local end I get
Is there something else I need to set up?
Colin
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions