Question about RFC9234 support #12359
-
|
It seems some OSes like RouterOS supports RFC9234 with additional roles defined for iBGP peer type. Is this compliant with the RFC? Is such support a WIP with FRR? Or no support for such roles are planned?
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
|
RFC9234 does not define other roles than provider, customer, peer, rs, rs-client. In FRR it's something like |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
So in effect, RFC9234 is not applicable to iBGP peers? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
only eBGP |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
RFC9234 does not define other roles than provider, customer, peer, rs, rs-client. In FRR it's something like
remote-as external,remote-as internal.