You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I notice that the model does a good job with predicting a repeat but struggles with replicating the sequence, here is the first parts of the subsequences of this sample prediction:
I realize that we don't need this functionality from the model, as we only need the absence of a repeat in these subsequences. Would it make sense then to predict a single additional class for bases in non-repeat subsequences, making the prediction and output of the model like this?
I notice that the model does a good job with predicting a repeat but struggles with replicating the sequence, here is the first parts of the subsequences of this sample prediction:
I realize that we don't need this functionality from the model, as we only need the absence of a repeat in these subsequences. Would it make sense then to predict a single additional class for bases in non-repeat subsequences, making the prediction and output of the model like this?
(Or any other character to represent the absence of a repeat.)
Would that be easy to test?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: