Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(asm): fix actions processing from RC [backport 2.9] #9405

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 28, 2024

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented May 28, 2024

Backport 99239e5 from #9399 to 2.9.

Fix action definitions management through RC.

Successfully tested in backend prod.

Checklist

  • Change(s) are motivated and described in the PR description
  • Testing strategy is described if automated tests are not included in the PR
  • Risks are described (performance impact, potential for breakage, maintainability)
  • Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation)
  • Library release note guidelines are followed or label changelog/no-changelog is set
  • Documentation is included (in-code, generated user docs, public corp docs)
  • Backport labels are set (if applicable)
  • If this PR changes the public interface, I've notified @DataDog/apm-tees.

Reviewer Checklist

  • Title is accurate
  • All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal
  • Description motivates each change
  • Avoids breaking API changes
  • Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks
  • Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation)
  • Release note makes sense to a user of the library
  • Author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment
  • Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the release branch maintenance policy

Fix action definitions management through RC.

Successfully tested in backend prod.

## Checklist

- [x] Change(s) are motivated and described in the PR description
- [x] Testing strategy is described if automated tests are not included
in the PR
- [x] Risks are described (performance impact, potential for breakage,
maintainability)
- [x] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation)
- [x] [Library release note
guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html)
are followed or label `changelog/no-changelog` is set
- [x] Documentation is included (in-code, generated user docs, [public
corp docs](https://github.com/DataDog/documentation/))
- [x] Backport labels are set (if
[applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting))
- [x] If this PR changes the public interface, I've notified
`@DataDog/apm-tees`.

## Reviewer Checklist

- [ ] Title is accurate
- [ ] All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal
- [ ] Description motivates each change
- [ ] Avoids breaking
[API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces)
changes
- [ ] Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks
- [ ] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation)
- [ ] Release note makes sense to a user of the library
- [ ] Author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications
of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment
- [ ] Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the
[release branch maintenance
policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)

(cherry picked from commit 99239e5)
@github-actions github-actions bot added the ASM Application Security Monitoring label May 28, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot requested review from a team as code owners May 28, 2024 13:25
@christophe-papazian christophe-papazian enabled auto-merge (squash) May 28, 2024 13:28
@datadog-dd-trace-py-rkomorn
Copy link

Datadog Report

Branch report: backport-9399-to-2.9
Commit report: 203ef22
Test service: dd-trace-py

✅ 0 Failed, 112105 Passed, 1141 Skipped, 48m 39.21s Total duration (5m 38.13s time saved)

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 9 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 10.01%. Comparing base (26c2ac5) to head (203ef22).
Report is 1 commits behind head on 2.9.

Files Patch % Lines
tests/appsec/appsec/test_remoteconfiguration.py 0.00% 8 Missing ⚠️
ddtrace/appsec/_remoteconfiguration.py 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##              2.9    #9405       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   27.73%   10.01%   -17.73%     
===========================================
  Files        1259     1256        -3     
  Lines      119987   120062       +75     
===========================================
- Hits        33280    12025    -21255     
- Misses      86707   108037    +21330     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@christophe-papazian christophe-papazian added ASM Application Security Monitoring and removed ASM Application Security Monitoring labels May 28, 2024
@christophe-papazian christophe-papazian merged commit 9db7603 into 2.9 May 28, 2024
27 checks passed
@christophe-papazian christophe-papazian deleted the backport-9399-to-2.9 branch May 28, 2024 13:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ASM Application Security Monitoring
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants