Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate to latest (Dev) Local and Client Cloud versions #1

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

marksto
Copy link

@marksto marksto commented Dec 4, 2023

Hi Kenny,

Thank you for a cute testing lib! It's been a while since your last last commit to the repo though, and things have changed in a way that makes it impossible the further use of this testing lib with the (currently) latest version of Datomic Cloud.

The following things have changed:

  • Dev Local name — from dev-local to just local
  • local is released under Apache 2.0, thus available through Maven
  • :server-type value — from :dev-local to :datomic-local

Here's a small patch that implements the necessary changes in dev-local-tu. I've also upgraded Clojure version to 1.11.1, which is currently the latest stable one. I also tweaked an obviously verbose piece of code and fixed a compiler reflection warning (pardon for shipping this along).

Feel free to review and release an updated version of the artifact at your convenience.

Cheers,
Mark

The following things have changed:
- Dev Local name — from `dev-local` to just `local`
- `local` is released under Apache 2.0, thus available through Maven
- `:server-type` value — from `:dev-local` to `:datomic-local`

https://docs.datomic.com/cloud/datomic-local.html?search=1.0.126#267
Reflection warning, dev_local_tu/core.clj:34:23 - reference to field getAbsolutePath can't be resolved.
@marksto
Copy link
Author

marksto commented Apr 1, 2024

@kennyjwilli, hi! Can this PR be merged, can't it?

@marksto
Copy link
Author

marksto commented Sep 15, 2024

@kennyjwilli, hi! It would be nice if you can check and hopefully merge these changes.

@danmidwood
Copy link

@marksto Have you considered publishing your branch under a different name?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants