You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
We have issues with multiple types of toothbrushes being identified as the same toothbrush.
Additional context
My toothbrush gives the following bytearray(b'2\x06k') which is similar, but different from the device_bytes in the manufacturer_id.
The problem is that we face the same problem with manufacturer_id - there is no way to know all of the modelids upfront. They don't correspond with the type_id on the bottom of the toothbrush(potentially another char does?)
The second problem is that we have no idea if the ones with the same device bytes from advertisement data would have the same model_id here.
Not sure if this is even worth looking at, as model does relatively little except for be a piece of text, and as long as we get io series or smart series, we are fine.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
We have issues with multiple types of toothbrushes being identified as the same toothbrush.
Describe the solution you'd like
There is a characteristic "a0f0ff02-5047-4d53-8208-4f72616c2d42" that is described as model here: https://github.com/wise86-android/OralBlue_python/blob/15e1a03bcb3350574d438e4593bcff59608a77a7/Protocol.md
Additional context
My toothbrush gives the following
bytearray(b'2\x06k')
which is similar, but different from the device_bytes in the manufacturer_id.The problem is that we face the same problem with manufacturer_id - there is no way to know all of the modelids upfront. They don't correspond with the type_id on the bottom of the toothbrush(potentially another char does?)
The second problem is that we have no idea if the ones with the same device bytes from advertisement data would have the same model_id here.
Not sure if this is even worth looking at, as model does relatively little except for be a piece of text, and as long as we get io series or smart series, we are fine.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: