Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

DeFilytica: Aggregation of historical core pool stats across deployments #60

Open
Tritium-VLK opened this issue Dec 21, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

DeFilytica: Aggregation of historical core pool stats across deployments #60

Tritium-VLK opened this issue Dec 21, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees
@Xeonus
Labels
Scoping

Comments

@Tritium-VLK
Copy link
Member

Tritium-VLK commented Dec 21, 2023 •
edited by Xeonus
Loading

https://github.com/BalancerMaxis/protocol_fee_allocator?tab=readme-ov-file#checking-the-allocation-results

A main goal for DeFilytica and Balancer v2 should be the following stats:

  • an overview of historical fee rounds aggregated and coded per chain
  • per pool performance expandable modals if needed
@Tritium-VLK Tritium-VLK changed the title Dump earned/collected ratios per chain in a json output file for defilytica Add great historical views for core pools to defilytica so that we don't need the google sheet anymore Feb 5, 2024
@Xeonus
Copy link
Contributor

Xeonus commented Mar 18, 2024

Add fee performance metrics per chain (historically, aggregated)

@Xeonus
Copy link
Contributor

Xeonus commented Apr 9, 2024

With the new feature from the historical PR: #159 we can build an aggregated view which now needs to be completed

@Xeonus Xeonus changed the title Add great historical views for core pools to defilytica so that we don't need the google sheet anymore DeFilytica: Aggregation of historical core pool stats across deployments May 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@Xeonus Xeonus

Labels
Scoping
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@Xeonus @SHAKOTN @Tritium-VLK