"Fake"/"Real" FAQ titles are confusing, not in a good way

[reefdog]

I read "Fake FAQ" not as "questions that aren't actually frequently asked" but as "these answers are fake", yet the answers are real and accurate.

Consider something like "Kinda FAQ" (formerly "Fake") and "Actually FAQ" (formerly "Real")?

[slifty]

How do you know they aren't fake?

[reefdog]

You may try, but you cannot fully mask your aching sincerity!

[slifty]

What about "Official FAQ" and "Underground FAQ"

or maybe "Directors Cut FAQ"

[chriszs]

I like it because it's like how the kids today have rinstas and finstas, as the j-dog taught us. I shared reef's expectation, but isn't "not in a good way" just another way of saying it's a bad idea?

[slifty]

How about "Good FAQ" and "Bad FAQ"

[chriszs]

Frequently Asked Questions, "Frequently" "Asked" "Questions"

Although I feel like we did the sarcastic quotes somewhere else.

[slifty]

(we did... in the FAQ)

[chriszs]

Awkward. I'm going to blame this on somebody else.

[reefdog]

"not in a good way" was a terrible way to say it. I meant, "not in a way which enhances one's ultimate enjoyment upon understanding them".

I also think our lack of a good alternative means KEEP 'EM