Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Feedback on interface abstraction layers #57

Open
portante opened this issue Apr 22, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

Feedback on interface abstraction layers #57

portante opened this issue Apr 22, 2017 · 0 comments
Assignees
@Hugh472 @saacg @djfinn14 @sarthakjagetia @vsemp
Labels
enhancement

Comments

@portante
Copy link
Member

Let's consider what it would take to re-work the inventory and network abstraction layers into classes, and not using modules to achieve a singleton behavior.

It seems the notion of a singleton is coming from HIL. It is not clear that requirement carries over.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@Hugh472 Hugh472

@saacg saacg

@djfinn14 djfinn14

@sarthakjagetia sarthakjagetia

@vsemp vsemp

Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
6 participants
@portante @Hugh472 @saacg @djfinn14 @sarthakjagetia @vsemp