You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For the case where the goal is behind the robot, that is α ∉ (−pi/2 , pi/2 ], we reverse the vehicle by negating v and γ in the control law
But the implementation here just negate linear velocity.
Expected behavior
I tested with negating both linear velocity & angular velocity, the control vibrates, but the overall trajectory makes more sense than only negating the linear velocity.
Screenshots
Negate Both
Negate only linear velocity
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the bug
As the book says,
But the implementation here just negate linear velocity.
Expected behavior
I tested with negating both linear velocity & angular velocity, the control vibrates, but the overall trajectory makes more sense than only negating the linear velocity.
Screenshots
Negate Both
Negate only linear velocity
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: