You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It's currently possible to link to an XBRL element via a fragment in the viewer URL (e.g. #f-f1 links to the fact with ID f1).
It would also be useful to be able to link to HTML elements via id attributes. This currently works in a single-document viewer in non-stub-viewer mode.
We would need to resolve how to deal with conflicts (on the above, @brettkail-wk suggested using a format that always starts with a number for fact fragment IDs, which would be illegal for an actual id attribute). Another possibility would be to use a different format for HTML fragments, e.g. #h-.... This would make it possible to construct a format that copes with multiple documents in the viewer, but would mean that existing cross links between documents would not work.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What should we change and why?
It's currently possible to link to an XBRL element via a fragment in the viewer URL (e.g.
#f-f1
links to the fact with IDf1
).It would also be useful to be able to link to HTML elements via
id
attributes. This currently works in a single-document viewer in non-stub-viewer mode.This was discussed here
We would need to resolve how to deal with conflicts (on the above, @brettkail-wk suggested using a format that always starts with a number for fact fragment IDs, which would be illegal for an actual
id
attribute). Another possibility would be to use a different format for HTML fragments, e.g.#h-...
. This would make it possible to construct a format that copes with multiple documents in the viewer, but would mean that existing cross links between documents would not work.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: