Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade fs-extra from 9.0.1 to 9.1.0 #42

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mathiasrw
Copy link
Member

@mathiasrw mathiasrw commented Jan 21, 2021

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade fs-extra from 9.0.1 to 9.1.0.

merge advice
ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 1 version ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released 2 days ago, on 2021-01-19.

The recommended version fixes:

Severity Issue PriorityScore (*) Exploit Maturity
Prototype Pollution
SNYK-JS-AJV-584908
405/1000
Why? CVSS 8.1
No Known Exploit

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Release notes
Package name: fs-extra from fs-extra GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: fs-extra
  • 1625838 9.1.0
  • 76d38fc tests: fix birthtime not available on tmpfs on Linux (#861)
  • d409cf8 Add promise support for fs.rm() (#860)
  • 6bffcd8 Upgrade universalify (#825)
  • 96facaa Docs: add fse-cli to the README (#815)

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs


This change is Reviewable

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants