dynamic_smagorinsky_coeffs #845
Closed
bronise777
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
Can you point to the line in a paper that is making you think this? You could be right. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Formula 17 on page 365 in Martín, M. Pino, U. Piomelli, and G. V. Candler. "Subgrid-Scale Models for Compressible Large-Eddy |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
In the pc_dynamic_smagorinsky_coeffs function, should M here be the difference of the stress tensor instead of the product?
// "resolved turbulent stresses" and others
for (int dir = 0; dir < AMREX_SPACEDIM * AMREX_SPACEDIM; dir++) {
M[dir] = betaij[dir] * alphaij(i, j, k, dir);
}
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions