You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Alejandro Bodas's presentation at the 2023 Momentum Workshop says they retuned the GC5-N96ORCA1 PI control aiming at rsut=99, rlut=240.5, close to CERES EBAF4 values (because UKESM suggested PI and current were pretty close). Used two_d_fsd_factor = 1.70, cape_timescale =2700 s in place of standard two_d_fsd_factor=1.65 cape_timescale=1800.0, though not clear if this is the final value.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Latest CM3 runs (e.g.
cm3-run-16-09-2024
) have a net TOA energy flux around 2.7 W/m^2 initially.Met Office GC5 AMIP runs were tuned to give the desired radiation balance at N216, not N96. The tuning is described at https://code.metoffice.gov.uk/trac/gmed/wiki/ticket/573/TicketDetails describes the radiation tuning of the N216 version.
This is an extract of the table near the end of https://code.metoffice.gov.uk/trac/gmed/wiki/ticket/577/TicketSensitivityTests
RC3 is almost the same as the final version, except for an update to the boundary layer buoyancy https://code.metoffice.gov.uk/trac/jules/ticket/1242.
Alejandro Bodas's presentation at the 2023 Momentum Workshop says they retuned the GC5-N96ORCA1 PI control aiming at rsut=99, rlut=240.5, close to CERES EBAF4 values (because UKESM suggested PI and current were pretty close). Used
two_d_fsd_factor = 1.70, cape_timescale =2700 s
in place of standardtwo_d_fsd_factor=1.65 cape_timescale=1800.0
, though not clear if this is the final value.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: